I'm having a dilemma regarding this year's
presidential elections: I don't want to vote for either of
these guys!
I'm a Republican who did not vote for
Bush. I thought his father was the worst president of my lifetime
(and that includes Nixon!) and expected no better from him. I
was wrong. Bush fils has been an okay president. He's not
great but he hasn't driven the country into the ground either.
America's still been an okay place to live under him. Bush Sr. made
this country into a nightmare. Divisiveness,
strife, and stress ruled the four years of the first Bush
administration. America was not a fun place to live during those four
years.
I remember back in the waning days of Reagan
when people at a roundtable I was an assistant SysOp for on the GEnie
information service were talking down Bush pere and saying it
was time to try the expatriate-in-Paris thing. I couldn't understand
it. I thought they were cracked. Then Bush became president and I
understood all too well. Bush left such a bad taste in my mouth that
I've voted Democrat for president ever since.
I expected the same from our current Bush but
was pleasantly surprised. When 9-11 happened I was glad we had
a Republican president because I knew he'd go out there and kick ass,
take names, and do what needed to be done. I just don't believe Al
Gore would have had the spine for it. I perceive him as if he would
have wanted to negotiate, open diplomatic talks, and hold hearings
into what we had done to bring this upon ourselves. Blech.
None-the-less, I'm still not crazy about
Bush. I doubt that under four more years of Bush I'd still think he
was an okay president. I'm convinced my opinion will drift into
Reagan territory.
"Reagan was a great one-term president."
"But he served two terms."
"Yeah, that's the problem."
Bush is doing a lot of things I just don't
like. Ashcroft. The "Patriot" Act. Cheney. Ashcroft. Halliburton.
Cheney. Siding with the money gouging, profiteering drug companies
against desperate Americans. Ashcroft. Just to name a few.
I hoped so much that the Dems could
come up with a strong candidate. Instead what did we get? The howler,
the mortician, the Keebler elf, the "social activist" comedy
relief.... Ugh. I'm sorry, I think Kerry is a joke. He's far too
liberal to win. I don't think any of the Democratic candidates
could have beaten Bush. The only question is are people going to get
such an incredible distaste for Iraq that they'll do anything
to get rid of Bush just to extricate us from there? Call it the
Spanish Factor.
So who am I going to vote for? I
definitely will not be voting Democratic this year, unless
something really bad happens to Kerry and they have to start over.
I'd rather not vote for Bush either. Hmm, protest vote to Nader?
Perhaps I'll just throw it all to the wind and write myself in. Yeah,
that might work.