The random thoughts of a genius...er...gene nash.
who has time to watch these things?
Published on May 6, 2005 By Gene Nash In Movie Reviews
In which I continue to comment on movies I haven't seen.


Charlie and the Chocolate Factory

This one will go into the unnecessary remake hall of fame. From Johnny Depp's bizarre, cloying take on the character, to that insipid theme music that sounds like a bad cover-band version of the Itchy and Scratchy tune, this has all the makings of a train wreck.

Johnny Depp is such a critic's darling right now, he'll no doubt be highly praised. How long till they sign him up as Rhett Butler? Is the world ready for a "quirky" Rhett Butler?

If they had to remake this, I wish they had gone really far afield and had a totally different set of kids.

Oh well. The original's an Everlasting Gobstopper. It stands up so well that not only could it have been made today, there's no way they could have made the exact same film any better even with today's money and technology -- as we're about to find out. This one can stay in its wrapper as far as I am concerned.


Dukes of Hazzard

God awful. Johnny Knoxville and Seann William Scott as the Dukes? A blonde Daisy? And why were the scenes I saw taking place in a city?

I guess we're going to find out how much star power Jessica Simpson really has. They should push it back to October. I expect this one to tank.


Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith

Nice to see Georgie finally got to pull out his "Revenge of" title.

I'm still trying to find a widescreen DVD of the second one, er, fifth one before this comes out. (That's right, Star Wars II is the only Star Wars film I didn't see in the theaters during its initial run. That right there should tell you what I think of the current trilogy.) Every place around here (including the libraries, Blockbuster, and Hollywood Video) only carry the full screen version. Grrrrr. I'm not watching full screen Star Wars, dammit!

On the plus side, expectations are so low it shouldn't take much to exceed them. On the minus side, George Lucas still can't figure out how to make a sequel and has shown no signs of having repurchased his soul from the marketing devil.

It'll probably be cool, though, if only from the presence of Darth Vader. Hopefully he'll have some significant screen time. (If he only shows up at the end, we're doomed. I guess I should have read the end of the book while I was at Wal-Mart yesterday, but I really don't want to know ahead of time.) We may even forgive George a little (especially if he'd release the original versions of the films on DVD and stop messing with them. Actually he's already promised to mess with them more. He's converting them all to 3-D and will be releasing the new 3-D versions one a year beginning in 2007. Like an idiot, I'll be lined up with all the other Star Nerds. *SIGH*)

It may depend on how good Fantastic Four is whether this is the top film of the summer or not. I wouldn't be surprised though if this is the second year in history where a Star Wars film is released and doesn't manage to reach number one in the year-end box office tally. (Spiderman beat out the last Star Wars wannabe-epic.)

Oh well, if the movie isn't cool, at least the toys are. Have you seen these things? It's about time we had some cool new Darth Vader stuff to play with!

The best Star Wars movie of the last 23 years? Matrix Revolutions.


Jiminy Glick in La La Wood

Who thought this was such a good idea they financed it? The Short kids should immediately investigate whether or not they have any inheritances left.


I'll be back soon with more "ill informed movie critiques."

Comments
on May 06, 2005
Dukes of Hazard.  I cant beleive they are casting Burt Reynolds to be Boss Hogg!  That has got to be the worst casting in the history of movies!
on May 06, 2005
on May 06, 2005
Charlie & The Chocolate Factory:

I'm actually looking forwrd to this one. Not that I think it will be a great improvement over the original, that is one of my all time favorite movies. However, I've always looked at the original as a fun fantasy type film. Most people I talk to seem to see it as a dark freaked out kind of a story. I want to see this one, just to get some insight on what people say about the "freaky" "Dark" nature of the original.

Dukes of Hazzard:

I'm just wanting to see the reaction Hollywood gets now that the Confederate Battle Flag has become a sign of the devil! ;~D
on May 06, 2005
*** I was complaining about Charlie and the Chocolate Factory the other day, and someone told me that it WASN'T a remake, that Johnny Depp was actually playing a grown up Charlie. True, maybe?

I really like Tim Burton, so I have to reserve judgment. I don't have a lot of hope, though. There were parts of the original I thought they "fluffed up" a little; Dahl was a lot darker and more wicked, I think. Maybe this will strike a better tone.

*** Dukes will suck, no question. It will be stuffed full of pop culture references and butchered just like the Beverly Hillbillies was.

*** Revenge of the Sith will be good, no question. I think this is George Lucas's big "Screw You" to the fans who have been giving him hell over Jar Jar.

*** Jiminy Glick in La La Wood? Never even knew they were making it. Funny show, but then funny shows always make crappy movies. Stinks of Lorne Micheals.
on May 06, 2005
P.S. Kevin "Silent Bob" Smith did a review of Sith and speaks highly of it. If you don't mind spoilers it is worth looking into.
on May 06, 2005
I think I forgot to add my box office predictions:
Charlie & -- Moderate Hit
Hazzard -- FLOP
Star Wars -- Major Hit, regardless of quality, though possibly only #2 on the year.
Jiminy Glick -- Not released wide enough to be anything but a MAJOR FLOP. It's strictly a vanity release for what is essentially a straight to video project. (Sorry about the inheritances, kids.)

These will all be out before the end of summer, by the way. Should I start adding release dates?


I cant beleive they are casting Burt Reynolds to be Boss Hogg! 


Any way you cut it, that movie has got to suck. (I love Burt, but he hasn't changed his schtick since the 70's. Terrible casting idea.)

(I finally saw some scenes in Hazzard. Jessica can't act -- and, in my opinion, she's not ample enough to compensate.)


I'm actually looking forward to this one.


Quite a few people are (not including me, of course ). There seem to be a lot of Dahl lovers who hate the original version and want a more faithful adaptation to sink their teeth into.

I think it will be at least a moderate hit if only because of Tim Burton and Johnny Depp (should I have disclaimed that I don't care for either of them?) but it won't be a classic anymore than Burton's Planet of the Apes could unseat the originals.

(There's still never been a Planet of the Apes faithful to the original novel. Pity. It had some interesting ideas, and a really shocking ending.)


someone told me that it WASN'T a remake, that Johnny Depp was actually playing a grown up Charlie.


They are more ill informed than I am. Depp plays Wonka. See Internet Movie Database for details: http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0367594/

You can watch the trailer over at http://movies.yahoo.com/ .

It's an adaptation of the book, which makes it a remake, even though Burton likes to toss around terms like "re-imagining." It's supposedly more in keeping with Dahl's "original vision" (which doesn't necessarily mean it's a faithful adaptation, fan boys. And knowing Burton, I would doubt it.)


If you don't mind spoilers it is worth looking into.


I'll skip it. I've even avoided anything that would tell me too much about Ep. II till I can get my hands on a widescreen version.
on May 06, 2005
(I finally saw some scenes in Hazzard. Jessica can't act -- and, in my opinion, she's not ample enough to compensate.)


The original could not either!
on May 08, 2005
I have the Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith graphic novel. The story is good although the original trilogy is still a lot better. Revenge of the Sith will definetly be the darkest Star Wars film out of the six judging from the graphic novel. I will still have to see the movie to have an opinion of how good it is. I probably spoiled the movie for myself by reading the graphic novel but I found it in the book store and I was like "Score!" and had to get it before it gets sold out or something. I just couldn't resist the temptation to read the graphic novel before seeing the movie. I would have gotten the novel too, but it's not out on paperback yet.
on May 09, 2005
Hey, Jesse! Good to see you.

Dark is good. I like dark. My favorite genre is, after all, "dark fantasy" (i.e. "Horror"). My favorite Star Wars movie is the one that was till now the darkest, The Empire Strikes Back.

People might not remember, there was some heat given over Empire being "too dark." If that caused Lucas to overcompensate with the dreck known as Return of the Jedi, those who complained should be boiled in oil. (Or maybe covered alive in wax. House of Wax, anyone? )

Since he's announced that this will be the last, he doesn't have to worry about the complaints or feel any need to overcompensate. Goodie. I can't believe people are complaining that this isn't kid friendly. Star Wars never should have been kids' movies to begin with, and weren't till Lucas overcompensated with Jedi and started the horror of 2-hour long toy commercials we've suffered ever since.


I remember devouring all things Empire before I saw it, including the graphic novel. (That was before they were called graphic novels!)

It didn't ruin the movie for me, but I wouldn't do it now. These days I would rather be surprised. To not know what is coming (for the rare films for which I can't figure out everything that is about to happen within the first 3 minutes, if not from the trailer) is a rare pleasure I'd hate to accidentally destroy.

The first film I saw where I really had absolutely no idea what was going to happen, and so first experienced that pleasure, was the Jane Eyre with Orson Welles. I didn't see that till I was 16 or 17, so well after the first Star Wars cycle.

Seems I've changed some in the last 20-some years. And what changed me in that way was 1944's Jane Eyre, of all things.