The random thoughts of a genius...er...gene nash.
t-shirt? what t-shirt?
Published on February 1, 2006 By Gene Nash In Politics

It's hard to get a bead on this story. Every report seems to be different. I'll give you the gist of what I derived with a caveat as to its complete accuracy.

Cindy Sheehan was arrested just before the State of the Union speech last night. Sitting in the gallery at the invitation of California Representative Lynn Woolsey, Sheehan revealed she was wearing a sloganeering t-shirt that had the number of American soldiers killed in Iraq listed on it (I guess she doesn't worry about Afghan troops) and apparently text that read something like "How many more?"

In other words, business as usual for Sideshow Cindy.

Prior to the big reveal, Sheehan had concealed the shirt, covering it in some way not clear in any of the reports I read. Right there, if that part of the story is accurate and I believe it is or I doubt she could have gotten as far as she did, you know she knows she was doing wrong, because she concealed the shirt. If she thought it was perfectly okay, why not be flagrant?

When Capitol Police told her it was unlawful to politic from the gallery and she'd have to remove the shirt, she either ignored them or refused. Either way, she was arrested and led from the chamber. I suppose it's not surprising she wasn't smart enough to wait till the speech was going on to reveal the shirt, or even to cover it up and then reveal it again at a more opportune moment.

Now, I'm in disagreement with some people I know over Ms. Sheehan. They side with David Letterman in his opinion of, "(How can you) have nothing but endless sympathy for a woman like Cindy Sheehan?" And when it comes to her loss -- the death of her son Casey as a soldier in Iraq -- I do. It is a horrible and tragic burden to bear -- one that's shared by a husband and family that disagree with her and who have asked her to stop. But that burden and loss do not give her a free pass for anything she subsequently feels like doing. She has chosen to go after a sitting President, she has chosen to make herself an outspoken activist, and by entering the marketplace of free ideas, she has opened herself and her ideas up for evaluation and vetting. In that regard, I find her seriously wanting.

What we got last night was Sheehan as usual, thinking the way to get attention is to defiantly do things she's not permitted to and create controversy. Sideshow Cindy at her best. What she could not possibly grasp is how powerful her mere presence could have been. The television cameras -- alerted in advance to her presence -- would have shown her repeatedly, especially during anything the President said on Iraq, and especially when the President introduced the family of a fallen soldier that supports the war effort despite the loss of a son. She could have gone outside and had the press hanging on her every word as she denounced the speech. She could have been seen on newscasts across the country, blasting the President, and reiterating her message.

Instead she threw it all away for another cheap trick. What a pity. Some people look to Cindy Sheehan for leadership. All they'll ever find is publicity stunts.

According to The Associated Press, prior to heading toward the Capitol, Sheehan and a "handful" of others had stood outside the White House yelling, "You're evicted! Get out of our house!" There were no cameras around to capture the moment, which begs the question: If a protestor protests and no-one hears it, is she really protesting? Cindy Sheehan is going to find out. I feel as sorry for her then as I do for her now over the loss of her son.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 01, 2006
She had time to break away from her high level conference with Chavez?  I am surprised.
on Feb 01, 2006
Way back when a rock singer named Grace Slick was part of a group of people invited to meet Prs. Nixon. Her name was on the official "never let this person anywhere near anyone of importance" list, but in this case, the names weren't cross referenced to non stage names, I guess.

Anyway, Grace Slick decided it would be cool to slip the president a hit of acid while shaking his hand (since LSD can be absorbed through the skin). Of course, a secret service agent recognized her and pulled her out of the line, and ejected her from the White House.

A few years later (after she spent a lot of time complaining about how unfairly she was treated), she admitted to the attempt at a practical joke. A few years ago I saw her on a TV show, where she joked about that day. She also joked about how the government knew that if she had the chance, she'd do something stupid and not care how many laws she broke doing it. She also admitted that they were right.

Apparently Grace Slick learned a few things between her radical days and today... apparently Cindy Whatsername needs to learn a few lessons from Grace Slick.
on Feb 01, 2006
In the chamber and before the people that are charged with the responsibility of protecting our most basic freedom, a U. S. Citizen is removed for wearing a shirt that states the number of our dead and her FREE SPEACH “NO More”. She was not disruptive; she was properly in the chamber and yet was ejected from the House of Representatives. WHY- Because she had the nerve to express HER OPINION which is in opposition to that of George W, Bush! Our nation is heading down a very dangerous path under this president!
on Feb 01, 2006
ColGene, she broke the law. Not only that, but she knew she was breaking the law. She may have chosen to use civil disobedience to make her point, but she can't choose whether or not she is arrested for her civil disobedience.

Should they have ignored her, and let her break the law, just because she is Cindy Sheehan? Or do you only defend her because she hates Bush almost as much as you do? The thing that Cindy and the media like to forget (if they ever knew in the first place) is that the State of the Union address is not for her to showboat, or even for the people to hear. It is a Constitutionally mandated report from the President to the houses of Congress. Because of technology and the media, we are able to listen to what the President has to say, but we are not participants in the proceedings.
on Feb 01, 2006
I have endless sympathy for Ms Sheehan's loss but like you said Gene, that doesn't mean she gets a pass on anything she does because of it. I personally think she just completely lost her mind when he died. That is an explaination though, not an excuse.

Grace Slick was high, Cindy Sheehan is insane with grief, what's your excuse Col Gene?
on Feb 02, 2006
ColGene, she broke the law. Not only that, but she knew she was breaking the law. She may have chosen to use civil disobedience to make her point, but she can't choose whether or not she is arrested for her civil disobedience.


Actually she did not break the law.

Updated: 8:18 p.m. ET Feb. 1, 2006

WASHINGTON - Capitol Police dropped a charge of unlawful conduct against antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan on Wednesday and apologized for ejecting her and a congressman’s wife from President Bush’s State of the Union address for wearing T-shirts with war messages.

“The officers made a good faith, but mistaken effort to enforce an old unwritten interpretation of the prohibitions about demonstrating in the Capitol,” Capitol Police Chief Terrance Gainer said in a statement late Wednesday.

“The policy and procedures were too vague,” he added. “The failure to adequately prepare the officers is mine.”
Story continues below ? advertisement

The extraordinary statement came a day after police removed Sheehan and Beverly Young, wife of Rep. C.W. “Bill” Young, R-Fla., from the visitors gallery Tuesday night. Sheehan was taken away in handcuffs before Bush’s arrival at the Capitol and charged with a misdemeanor, while Young left the gallery and therefore was not arrested, Gainer said.

“Neither guest should have been confronted about the expressive T-shirts,” Gainer’s statement said.

Sheehan’s T-shirt alluded to the number of soldiers killed in Iraq: “2245 Dead. How many more?” Capitol Police charged her with a misdemeanor for violating the District of Columbia’s code against unlawful or disruptive conduct on any part of the Capitol grounds, a law enforcement official said. She was released from custody and flew home Wednesday to Los Angeles.

Young’s shirt had a message with a different tone: “Support the Troops — Defending Our Freedom.”

“They said I was protesting,” Young told the St. Petersburg Times. “I said, ‘Read my shirt, it is not a protest.’ They said, ‘We consider that a protest.’ I said, ‘Then you are an idiot.”’

Link
on Feb 02, 2006
Yeah, Davad, I heard about that today too. I'm not sure why she covered up the shirt if she didn't think she was doing something wrong, but apparently she really wasn't.

Mrs. Young also getting ejected does tend to show that the policy is pretty well understood and equally enforced by the Capitol Police but apparently, no she didn't break the law.

The whole arrest thing would never have happened though, if she either left when asked, or just covered the shirt up again. The State of the Union address isn't a public forum though, and shouldn't be allowed to become one.
on Feb 02, 2006
Instead she threw it all away for another cheap trick.


the story of my life.

seriously (heh), it's a very good thing i'm not her.

i woulda had a message drawn on my skin and been waiting for someone to tell me to take my shirt off.
on Feb 02, 2006
I'm not sure why she covered up the shirt if she didn't think she was doing something wrong, but apparently she really wasn't.


It sounds like she wasn't really covering it up, she had a jacket on. It also sounds like it wasn't part of some devious plan she had because her going to the SOTU was a last minute thing.
on Feb 02, 2006
It sounds like she wasn't really covering it up, she had a jacket on. It also sounds like it wasn't part of some devious plan she had because her going to the SOTU was a last minute thing.


I find it interesting how you chose to defend a woman who has done so many wierd things to make her point and believe that she had no bad intentions in a place like the SOTU. Just because she had a jacket does not suggest she was not trying to hide it, it could also be seen as just an easier way to show the shirt. And she was invited by California Representative Lynn Woolsey so I doubt she only had 5 minutes to just go with the first thing she was wearing.
on Feb 02, 2006
Everything in its proper place, that's what my dad always tough me. She should have been thankful and felt lucky to have been invited to such an event. She should have respected the place and the people there, including the president. This is not a place to make spectacles. Nothing should could have done before or after the event outside of it. Freedom of expression does not give you the right to disrespect others. Shameful if you ask me, to her, her family and her dead son.
on Feb 02, 2006

I find it interesting how you chose to defend a woman who has done so many wierd things to make her point and believe that she had no bad intentions in a place like the SOTU. Just because she had a jacket does not suggest she was not trying to hide it, it could also be seen as just an easier way to show the shirt. And she was invited by California Representative Lynn Woolsey so I doubt she only had 5 minutes to just go with the first thing she was wearing.


I'm not defending her, I'm just stating the facts....which you're obviously not aware of.

"it could also be seen as just an easier way to show the shirt." Yeah, you're right it COULD be, but you don't know either way, do you?
on Feb 02, 2006
I have deep sympathy for Ms. Sheehan. In fact, I believe she should be committed to an inpatient mental health program, as her grief has driven her to complete irrationality.

It is important to note in her appearance that Ms. Sheehan is a signatory to the World Can't Wait campaign which calls for the resignation of Bush and Cheney (apparently, these folks are wetting their pants at the idea of a President Hastert!) and was initiated by the Revolutionary Communist Party. There is no doubt in my mind (and, I would imagine, little doubt in the minds of the Capitol Police) that Ms. Sheehan was essentially a plant with plans to disrupt the speech.

Personally, I think they acted too soon, though. They should have let her begin her demonstration, THEN acted. She would have only made herself look idiotic.
on Feb 02, 2006
This is not a place to make spectacles. Nothing should could have done before or after the event outside of it. Freedom of expression does not give you the right to disrespect others. Shameful if you ask me, to her, her family and her dead son.


Please enlighten me as to what "spectacle" she made, and who she disrespected.

Shameful you say? To her son? It really bugs me when people assume that her son, if he were alive, would oppose or be ashamed of what she's done. Did you know her son? Or are you just assuming that since he was a soldier that he has to be a certain way. Hopefully you know this already, but soldiers don't always agree politically, with the missions they're performing. That could be why there are so many Iraq veterans who are getting into politics as Democrats, and so few as Republicans.
on Feb 02, 2006
It really bugs me when people assume that her son, if he were alive, would oppose or be ashamed of what she's done.


I think that since her son REENLISTED just months before he was killed, it's a fair bet to say he supported our troops and action in Iraq.

Get the facts. Not the hype!
2 Pages1 2