HOW TO GET NOTHING BUT PRAISE IN 3 EASY STEPS

excerpted from 'the ju coward's cookbook'

Published on May 25, 2005 By Gene Nash In Blog Communities

How to get nothing but praise in 3 easy steps.

1) Blacklist everyone who might remotely disagree with you. (Surf other sites and forums looking for haters, just to make sure you don't miss anybody.) * Also remember, ANONYMOUS USERS ARE EVIL and must not be allowed to speak.
2) Now that it is safe, post a self-serving article asking what people really think of you.
3) Smugly snuggle back into your little cocoon, basking in the praise and deluding yourself that you are actually wanted.

Anyone who still manages to not praise you is not a person who "matters" and is safely ignored.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

*No matter how much time this takes, it is important and necessary as part of your crusade against intolerance and hate, and therefore does not come under the terms of someone needing to get a life.

[Excerpted from "The JU Coward's Cookbook." Get your copy today.]

Comments (Page 1)

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

Oh, and since you asked...

I think you are...
...odd
...humourless
...self-righteous
...a liar
...a dickwad
...someone who needs to get a life
...stupid beyond belief.
...a coward
...a fake
...intolerant
...hypocritical
...the most hateful person on JU (dabe not excluded)
...someone who definitely needs to GO AWAY.

You do nothing but post non-sequitur filled inanities or spew vile hate-filled tripe. The greatest contribution you could ever make to JU would be leaving it permanently.

manholepiece

on May 25, 2005

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

It would also be helpful to ignore the fact that the last time you engaged in a threat to leave JU unless certain bloggers were banished that you had all of 2 people willing to do the same.

I'd like to see a limit to the number of times someone can call for other bloggers to be banned before getting banned himself.

Not that I'm thinking of anyone in particular, of course.

here is the convo that provoked the "dont you just love me"

Thank you. I was wondering what he was babbling about.

If the "praise me" thread has been up for more than an hour with only one response, comment on it yourself to give it a bump.

You wouldn't want to deprive anyone the opportunity of extolling your wonderfulness, now would you?

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

By: MasonM Posted: Wednesday, May 25, 2005
Mano, I've always respected the fact that you refrain from attacking others and seem to be quite fair minded.

LMFAO!

Which just goes to show how far self-propaganda can go in shaping your own image.

You can fool some of the people all of the time...

David St. Hubbins

on May 25, 2005

Heh

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

Let me make it clearer for you, Baker.

1) Moron A posts an article asking people what they think of him, but only allows comments from those he expects will give him a favorable notice.
2) I point out the frivolity of Moron A's deceitful poll: he will only get praise.
3) I do exactly what was asked: give my opinion.

What is your problem?

Dr Guy

on May 25, 2005

Just curious. What do you have against each other? I know the LW and MP brawl, but somehow you never seem to be controversial enough to get on anyone's blacklist.

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

Just curious. What do you have against each other?

On my side -- I honestly belief my laundry list of negative things I think about him.
On his side -- he honestly thinks I am Sir Peter Maxwell, whom he passionately hates. (Either as me creating SPM or SPM creating me as a "fake supporter.")

Simple.

but somehow you never seem to be controversial enough to get on anyone's blacklist.

Oh, I'm on blacklists.

Even Mignuna had me blacklisted for quite a while.

Before you got here, I got pissed with the entire JU scene (mainly because of the SPM related internecine wars) and seriously throttled back my participation and started writing mainly non-threatening, harmless pap.

Gideon MacLeish

on May 25, 2005

hahaha, another tip. If the "praise me" thread has been up for more than an hour with only one response, comment on it yourself to give it a bump.

umm, LW...didn't you INVENT that tactic? ***ducking***

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

I haven't seen manopeace say or do anything that promotes the list of insults you have above.

Gee, you never noted it so it never happened. What an intelligent position.

I believe I could substantiate all those accurate descriptions with his own words and actions here. (With the possible exceptions of "odd" and "dickwad," which after all are highly subjective, though when you think about it we were all once dickwads. The "get a life" is mocking his own repeated use of the phrase.)

Hey, how about "How to get people to rally to your support in one easy step!" Just make a "he hurt my feelings and is a big stinky" blog. I don't think manopeace blacklisted everyone who disagrees with him, he just blacklisted people who reflexively disagree because of a grudge. DOn't blame him.

My, my, aren't we the mind reader today. You know how everyone on JU handles their blacklist. You know what is in my mind. You know what in manhole's mind. I guess you just know what motivates the whole "community" don't you?

For someone who took great umbrage at Aeryck putting words in your mouth, you don't have any problems doing the same to others, do you?

You took issue with Aeryck calling you Satan? Well, this is what your little buddy manhole had to say about me:
"the devil himself and hells angels...." He's spent the past year repeatedly insulting me. This is the first time I have ever said anything in response.

But because it's your lying little friend it's okay.

Yeah -- that's about your level.

You're right: you're a troll and off topic. So I'll respond to you as your little buddy manhole would:

"Be gone, Troll!!!"

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

his little experiment doesnt seem to be going so well.

That's was an easy one to predict.

I'm reminded of what Brad said after he banned someone else: "He wasn't popular, just prolific."

Moderateman

on May 25, 2005

know that you and MM have befriended Moano, and that's fine with me. But if he were to leave JU, I hardly see either of ya hanging up your spurs here to go off in a tizzy with him. Perhaps I'm wrong?

nope I am just like you in this manner < I go my own way, and I will always pick me over anyone here. even gimpyone my bestest friend.

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

P.S. BS,

I've temporarily shut you up. I plan on moving your flame to a more appropriate thread later.

Since you're too thick to get it, blinded by personal involvement as you are, let me explain.

This is not an "I've been blacklisted!" article. I'm sure manblow has had me blacklisted for the better part of a year. He can't take any kind of disagreement -- which is cowardly. His behavior here proves that isn't the long-term crusader he has constantly claimed to be. Cowards couldn't do what he has claimed. He can't take controversy. He can't stand disagreement. He needs a perfect little, "love me, love me" world.

He's a liar.

What this is is an "answer article," similar to an answer song. It's a popular device as you should well know having recently practiced it with PB and guns. It is a form I have used repeatedly for my entire time here.

You have a personal interest in turning it into something it isn't.

Gene Nash

on May 25, 2005

That's the worst he had for ya? hah! He once wrote an entire article about some ugly old witch that used to hassle innocent children in his neighborhood, and how happy they all were when she died. He compared this ugly old witch's behavior to mine, and was hoping I'd be banished at the time, for the cardinal sin of criticising a "friend" of his.

Indirect, but a death wish all the same, indicating his potential jubilance at my anticpated JU *death.*

Not the worst, just the most recent. You're right, he's said far worse about you and others. I'd have still kept my opinions to myself despite his ongoing attacks had he not so deceitfully asked in his drama queen way for opinions.

What I'm tired of is that this individual consistently demeans, condemns, and insults people only to be hailed as a saint who "would never say anything negative about anyone."

I can't decide if such people have their heads up their own ass, or his.

Ionolast

on May 25, 2005

He can't take any kind of disagreement -- which is cowardly

P.S. BS,

I've temporarily shut you up. I plan on moving your flame to a more appropriate thread later.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!